problem with abortion is nobody is agreed on when a fetus is actually a human baby with rights. its certainly not wrong to abort a fetus thats under a month old, and is certainly wrong to kill it a few minutes before its naturally born. so where r the line?
Abortions lines should only allow lifethreating situations
why? that implies that a fetus should be a baby with rights the second the egg is fertilized, which seems like bullshit to me
That's the grey area a lot of pro-lifers tend to run into.
It's better to question abortion on moral grounds.
Of course democratic liberals propose "morality is subjective therefore fuck morals therefore fuck fetuses that don't look like humans yet"
Even though at the time of conception fetuses have fully human chromosomes. But like I said. The definition of when a fetus deserves rights is a huge grey area both parties hate to go to.